Sources and admin layer
The architecture starts with PDFs, images, text files, Markdown, and controlled upload or bucket-sync processes. The key is that sources remain clearly identifiable.
This reference architecture shows how Retrieval Augmented Generation can be implemented reliably in an enterprise context: documents are processed deterministically, stored with versions, and exposed to agents only through read-only retrieval APIs and MCP.
A RAG architecture describes the technical structure that allows an AI system to answer from verified enterprise sources instead of relying only on model memory.
At its core, Retrieval Augmented Generation combines controlled document ingestion, a centralized knowledge store, a semantic search index, and a retrieval layer for applications, chatbots, or agents. For enterprise use cases, a vector database alone is not enough: versioning, citations, permissions, reindex jobs, and a read-only access path must be designed as architecture decisions.
The diagram condenses the architecture visually. The same structure is also described here as a clear architecture overview for decision makers, domain teams, and technical teams.
The architecture starts with PDFs, images, text files, Markdown, and controlled upload or bucket-sync processes. The key is that sources remain clearly identifiable.
The worker extracts text and page images, normalizes content, creates chunks, generates hashes, creates embeddings, and triggers controlled reindex jobs.
Object storage and PostgreSQL with pgvector keep original files, previews, metadata, document versions, chunks, embeddings, and access information together.
A RAG API and MCP server provide semantic search, document lookup, chunk context, citations, filters, and permissions.
Clients such as Codex, Claude, or Open Harness use read-only tools only. Models can run self-hosted or as cloud LLMs without receiving direct database access.
Kubernetes, starkAI Cloud, GDPR alignment, EU AI Act readiness, and ISO-27001-oriented controls belong to the operating model, not to a later add-on layer.
The architecture deliberately separates ingestion, storage, retrieval, and model use. Sources stay traceable, permissions remain auditable, and agents stay controlled in production.
PDFs, images, and Markdown are normalized, hashed, versioned, and reindexed in a repeatable way. Reindex jobs are controlled instead of implicit.
Original files, previews, metadata, document versions, chunks, and embeddings stay connected in a clear storage and index layer.
Agents access knowledge through the RAG API and MCP tools. Direct database or storage write permissions are not part of the client path.
An enterprise RAG architecture is useful when knowledge should not only be searched, but also used in an auditable, repeatable, and accountable way.
Employees need to find policies, project documents, manuals, or process knowledge through search and chat without losing the source trail.
Contracts, invoices, freight papers, technical specifications, or quote documents need to be ingested in a structured way and made reusable.
AI agents should use knowledge without receiving database or storage write permissions. Retrieval becomes the controlled interface between agent and knowledge.
When privacy, auditability, tenancy, citations, and version history matter, the RAG architecture has to support those requirements from the beginning.
A pillar page should not stand alone. These pages deepen the main search intents around enterprise knowledge, document processing, and AI enablement.
These answers cover the questions that usually need to be clarified before building an enterprise RAG system.
A vector database is only one component. A RAG architecture also includes ingestion, chunking, metadata, permissions, citations, retrieval APIs, MCP tools, model access, and operating processes.
Deterministic ingestion makes repeated document processing traceable through versions, hashes, and index runs. This matters for audits, debugging, and reliable updates.
MCP exposes agent-ready tools such as semantic search, document lookup, and chunk context. Agent clients can use knowledge without direct access to the database or object storage.
Besides embeddings, the knowledge store should keep original files, page previews, extracted assets, document versions, metadata, access information, and generated chunks.
Yes. The retrieval layer decouples knowledge access from the model runtime. Self-hosted models, cloud LLMs, or hybrid setups can be used without changing the enterprise data access path.
stark AI translates distributed documents, permissions, and operating requirements into a robust RAG target architecture with ingestion, knowledge store, retrieval, and operating model.